|
Subscribe to the Newsletter
Additional Posts
all downloads on this site are pdf files
Get Adobe Reader
to view them - its FREE

all media clips on this site are compatible with
Adobe Flash Player
get it - for FREE

|
Our Planet is in a crises. According to Stephen Hawking: "The danger is that global warming may become self-sustaining. We have to reverse global warming urgently, if we still can."
Numerous studies show that the most effective thing that we, as individuals, can do to slow global warming is follow a vegan diet:
|
— ARA: Think you can be a meat-eating environmentalist?
— Vegan Society: Eating the Earth?
— EarthSave: New Global Warming Srategy
— CIWF: Reducing Meat Consumption
— PeTA: Vegetarianism and the Environment
— LoBSA: What's the Best Action One Can Take on Earth Day?
Vegan Outreach
A Truly Inconvenient Truth
If one takes the threat of global
warming seriously,
the most
powerful personal step you can
take
may well be choosing a
vegetarian diet.
We hope you choose vegan at
your next meal ! |
 |
| |
|
Compassion in World Farming
The Global Benefits of Eating Less Meat
Rather than accepting that the
current trend towards a high-meat
diet is inescapable, an alternative
approach is essential. Unless we
begin to rely less upon animal
products in the human diet, we will
place an intolerable strain upon the
earth's resource with potentially
disastrous consequences for human
health and hunger, the natural
environment and animals' needs.
|
|
| |
|
Jewish Vegetarian Association
A SACRED DUTY
Key climate scientists, including James Hansen of NASA, warn that we may reach a tipping point within a decade after which global warming could spiral out of control. Recent reports, including the " Livestock's Long Shadow report by the UN, highlight the disastrous contributions of modern, intensive animal-based agriculture to this crisis. A Sacred Duty is a Jewish response to these issues. It offers simple, practical measures for reducing our impact on the planet. |
 |
| |
|
| |
| |
A vegan diet is the only reasonable diet for people in the developed world who care about
the environment or global poverty.
Over the past 20 years, the environmental argument against growing crops to be fed to
animals — so that humans can eat the animals — has grown substantially. Just this past
November (2006), the environmental problems associated with eating chickens, pigs, and
other animals were the subject of a 408-page United Nations scientific report titled Livestock’s Long Shadow.
The U.N. report found that the meat industry contributes to "problems of land degradation,
climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution, and loss of
biodiversity." The report concludes that the meat industry is "one of the … most significant
contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to
global."
|
|
:: Eating Meat is the no 1 consumer Cause of Global Warming
Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio, and others have brought the possibility of global cataclysm into sharp relief. What they have not been talking
about, however, is the fact that all cars, trucks, planes, and other types of transportation combined account for about 13 percent of global
warming emissions, whereas raising chickens, pigs, cattle, and other animals contributes to 18 percent, according to U.N. scientists. Yes,
eating animal products contributes to global warming 40 percent more than all SUVs, 18-wheelers, jumbo jets, and other types of travel
combined.
Al and Leo might not be talking about the connection between meat and global warming, but the Live Earth concert that Al inspired is: The
recently published Live Earth Global Warming Survival Handbook recommends, "Don’t be a chicken. Stop being a pig. And don’t have a
cow. Be the first on your block to cut back on meat." The Handbook further explains that "refusing meat" is "the single most effective thing
you can do to reduce your carbon footprint"
And Environmental Defense, on its website, notes, "If every American skipped one meal of chicken per week and substituted vegetables
and grains … the carbon dioxide savings would be the same as taking more than half a million cars off of U.S. roads."
Imagine if we stopped eating animal products altogether. |
top...
:: Eating Meat Wastes Resources
If a person lies in bed and never gets up, they will burn almost 2,500 calories each
day; that is what’s required to keep a human body alive.
|
The same physiological reality
applies to all animals: The vast majority of the calories consumed by a chicken, a pig,
a cow, or another animal goes into keeping that animal alive, and once you add to that
the calories required to create the parts of the animal that we don’t eat (eg., bones, feathers, and blood), you find that it takes more than 10 times as many calories of feed
given to an animal to get one calorie back in the form of edible fat or muscle.
In other words, it’s exponentially more efficient to eat grains, soy, or oats directly rather
than feed them to farmed animals so that humans can eat those animals. It’s like
tossing more than 10 plates of spaghetti into the trash for every one plate you eat.
And that’s just the pure “calories in, calories out” equation. When you factor in
everything else, the situation gets much worse. Think about the extra stages of
production that are required to get dead chickens, pigs, or other animals from the farm
to the table:
|
 |
– Grow more than 10 times as much corn, grain, and soy (with all the required tilling,
irrigation, crop dusters, and so on), as would be required if we ate the plants
directly.
– Transport - in gas-guzzling, pollution-spewing 18-wheelers - all that grain and
soy to feed manufacturers.
– Operate the feed mill (again, using massive amounts of resources).
– Truck the feed to the factory farms.
– Operate the factory farms.
– Truck the animals many miles to slaughterhouses.
– Operate the slaughterhouses.
– Truck the meat to processing plants.
– Operate the meat processing plants.
– Truck the meat to grocery stores (in refrigerated trucks).
– Keep the meat in refrigerators or freezers at the stores.
With every stage comes massive amounts of extra energy usage — and with that
comes heavy pollution and massive amounts of greenhouse gases, of course.
Obviously, vegan foods require some of these stages, too, but vegan foods cut out the
factory farms, the slaughterhouses, and multiple stages of heavily polluting tractor trailer
trucks, as well as all the resources (and pollution) involved in each of those
stages. And as was already noted, vegan foods require less than one-tenth as many
calories from crops, since they are turned directly into food rather than funneled
through animals first.
|
top...
|
|
:: Eating Meat Wastes and Pollutes Water
All food requires water, but animal foods are exponentially more wasteful of water than
vegan foods are. Enormous quantities of water are used to irrigate the corn, soy, and
oat fields that are dedicated to feeding farmed animals — and massive amounts of
water are used in factory farms and slaughterhouses.
|
 |
According to the National
Audubon Society, raising animals for food requires about as much water as all other
water uses combined. Environmental author John Robbins estimates that it takes
about 300 gallons of water to feed a vegan for a day, four times as much water to feed
an ovo-lacto vegetarian, and about 14 times as much water to feed a meat-eater.
Raising animals for food is also a water-polluting process. According to a report
prepared by U.S. Senate researchers, animals raised for food in the U.S. produce
86,000 pounds of excrement per second — that’s 130 times more than the amount of
excrement that the entire human population of the U.S. produces! Farmed animals’
excrement is more concentrated than human excrement, and is often contaminated
with herbicides, pesticides, toxic chemicals, hormones, antibiotics, and other harmful
substances. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, the runoff from factory
farms pollutes our rivers and lakes more than all other industrial sources combined. |
top...
:: Eating Meat Destroys the Rain Forest
The World Bank recently reported that 90 percent of all Amazon rainforest land cleared
since 1970 is used for meat production. It’s not just that we’re destroying the rainforest
to make grazing land for cows — we’re also destroying it to grow feed for them and
other animals. Last year, Greenpeace targeted KFC for the destruction of rainforests
because the Amazon is being razed to grow feed for chickens that end up in KFC’s
buckets. Of course, the rainforest is being used to grow feed for other chickens, pigs,
and cows, too (ie KFC isn’t the only culprit).
|
 |
top...
|
What About Eating Fish?
... read Animal Aid pamphlet on Fish Farming
Anyone who reads the news knows that commercial fishing fleets are plundering the
oceans and destroying sensitive aquatic ecosystems at an incomprehensible rate.
One super-trawler is the length of a football field, and can take in 800,000 pounds of
fish in a single netting. These trawlers scrape along the ocean floor, clear-cutting coral
reefs and everything else in their path. |
Hydraulic dredges scoop up huge chunks of
the ocean floor to sift out scallops, clams, and oysters. Most of what the fishing fleets
pull in isn’t even eaten by human beings; half is fed to animals raised for food, and
about 30 million tons each year are just tossed back into the ocean, dead, with
disastrous and irreversible consequences for the natural biological balance.
|
 |
Then there is aquaculture (fish farming), which is increasing at a rate of more than 10
percent annually. Aquaculture is even worse than commercial fishing because, for
starters, it takes about four pounds of wild-caught fish to reap just one pound of
farmed fish, which eat fish caught by commercial trawlers. Farmed fish are often
raised in the same water that wild fish swim in, but fish farmers dump antibiotics into
the water and use genetic breeding to create “Frankenstein fish.” The antibiotics
contaminate the oceans and seas, and the genetically engineered fish sometimes
escape and breed with wild fish, throwing delicate aquatic balances off-kilter.
Researchers at the University of Stockholm demonstrated that the horrible
environmental impact of fish farms can extend to an area 50,000 times larger than the
farm itself.
|
top...
|
:: Eating Meat Supports Cruelty
Caring for the environment means protecting all of our planet’s inhabitants, not just the
human ones. Chickens, pigs, turkeys, fish, and cows are intelligent, social animals
who feel pain, just as humans, dogs, and cats do. Chickens and pigs do better on
animal behavior cognition tests than dogs or cats, and are interesting individuals in the
same way. Fish form strong social bonds, and some even use tools.
|
 |
Yet these animals suffer extreme pain and deprivation in today’s factory farms.
Chickens have their sensitive beaks cut off with a hot blade, pigs have their tails
chopped off and their teeth removed with pliers, and cattle and pigs are castrated —
all without any pain relief. The animals are crowded together and given steady doses
of hormones and antibiotics in order to make them grow so quickly that their hearts
and limbs often cannot keep up, causing crippling and heart attacks. At the
slaughterhouse, they are hung upside-down and bled to death, often while they are
still conscious.
|
top...
:: What About Eating Meat That Isn’t From Factory-Farmed Animals?
Is meat better if it doesn’t come from factory-farmed animals? Of course, but its
production still wastes resources and pollutes the environment. Shouldn’t we
environmentalists challenge ourselves to do the best we can, not just to make choices
that are a bit less bad?
The UN report looks at meat at a global level and indicts the inefficiency and waste that are inherent in meat production. No matter where meat comes from, raising
animals for food will require that exponentially more calories be fed to animals than
they can produce in their flesh, and it will require all those extra stages of CO2-
intensive production as well. Only grass-fed cows eat food from land that could not
otherwise be used to grow food for human beings, and even grass-fed cows require
much more water and create much more pollution than vegan foods do.
|
top...
:: Conclusion
The case against eating animal products is ironclad; it’s not a new argument, and it
goes way beyond just global warming. Animals will not grow or produce flesh, milk, or
eggs without food and water; they won’t do it without producing excrement; and the
stages of meat, dairy, and egg production will always cause pollution and be resourceintensive.
This is the 11th hour for the environment. Where something as basic as eating animals
is concerned, the choice could not be any clearer: Every time we sit down to eat, we
can choose to eat a product that is, according to UN scientists, “one of the … most
significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale
from local to global,” or we can choose vegan — and preferably organic — foods. It’s
bad for the environment to eat animals. It’s time to stop looking for loopholes.
Considering the proven health benefits of a vegetarian diet — the American Dietetic
Association states that vegetarians have a reduced risk of obesity, heart disease, and
various types of cancer — there’s no need or excuse to eat chickens, pigs, eggs, and
other animal products. And vegan foods are available everywhere and taste great; as
with all foods — vegan or not — you just need to find the ones you like. You can get
great-tasting recipes, meal plans, cookbook recommendations, and more at VegCooking.com
|

|
What's the Best Action
One Can Take on Earth Day?
Watch video by LiveVegan
|
top...
|
Go Vegan
it is the single most important thing
YOU as an individual
can do to save our environment
free farm animals and heal your health

|
|